attractiveness poll!

Post by **Jonathan** » Sun Jun 06, 2004 6:15 am

Results for this poll probably indicate as much about what people think normal or average size is as their preferences for a woman's size.

Jason · Post by **Jason** » Sun Jun 06, 2004 6:49 am

my vote is greatly biased by who I am strongly attracted to at the moment.

When I was trying to go out with an average girl, I liked average girls. When I was trying to go out with a slightly less than average girl, I liked slightly less than average girls.

I doubt this makes very much sense, but you kind of compare your significant other to others in their weight class.

Peijen · Post by **Peijen** » Sun Jun 06, 2004 2:22 pm

i think you need to post example of each, because what I think is average might be different than what you think is average.

I dont like skin and bone in most cases.

Dave · Post by **Dave** » Sun Jun 06, 2004 3:15 pm

As long as they dont weigh more than me!

VLSmooth · Post by **VLSmooth** » Sun Jun 06, 2004 8:16 pm

I have to agree with Peijen here. We need examples. Heck I don't even know what's supposed to be average weight for a given height. Time to google I guess.

Alan · Post by **Alan** » Sun Jun 06, 2004 9:48 pm

I don't like anorexic girls or behemoths. Generally my tastes tend toward average or slightly under-average. If she's average, I prefer a soccer player's or runner's build. Sleek but muscular legs are a big turn on for me. Thunder-thighs, canckles, and stick-legs just don't do it for me.

But as you all know, I'm way too picky for my own good.

As for examples, someone like Keira Knightley would be at the low end of the weight scale for me. Any skinnier than her is probably too skinny. Someone with a build like Eliza Dushku or Drew Barrymore would be close to my upper limit. Yes, I'm picky.

Dave · Post by **Dave** » Sun Jun 06, 2004 11:31 pm

the real question is are you a leg or breast man?

<== legs

Alan · Post by **Alan** » Mon Jun 07, 2004 1:19 am

I look at the face, then legs, then stomach, then breasts.

For an example of what I look for, I like Kournikova's legs and Knightley's stomach.

This is such an enlightened discussion!

Alan · Post by **Alan** » Mon Jun 07, 2004 1:20 am

Peijen wrote:i think you need to post example of each, because what I think is average might be different than what you think is average.

Dwindlehop wrote:Results for this poll probably indicate as much about what people think normal or average size is as their preferences for a woman's size.

Alan · Post by **Alan** » Mon Jun 07, 2004 1:21 am

VLSmooth wrote:I have to agree with Peijen here. We need examples. Heck I don't even know what's supposed to be average weight for a given height. Time to google I guess.

No, don't google, just use your own opinion.

VLSmooth · Post by **VLSmooth** » Mon Jun 07, 2004 2:16 am

Alan wrote:I look at the face, then legs, then stomach, then breasts.

For an example of what I look for, I like Kournikova's legs and Knightley's stomach.

This is such an enlightened discussion!

Strangely enough, I found Knightley's stomach to be on the too skinny side. A quick googling reveals Eliza Dushku's figure is nice to me. As for priority, I go for face first, then overall body proportions. Everything needs to be proportional to each other to make the whole work IMHO. Yes, it's vague. Deal

VLSmooth · Post by **VLSmooth** » Mon Jun 07, 2004 2:17 am

As for my opinion, average

Peijen · Post by **Peijen** » Mon Jun 07, 2004 2:43 am

alright I voted for average, but what I think of as average is probably above average for some. I guess the none fat drew barrymore (charlie's angle 2) is about right.

so I guess, my preference of average to slightly below average is average+ for alan

Alan · Post by **Alan** » Mon Jun 07, 2004 4:42 am

Yeah I voted for under-average because I know my average is less than most other people's average.

Mohtalim

attractiveness poll!

Which is the most attractive, size-wise? (assume uniform hotness)

attractiveness poll!