Preakness
Damn it! Why couldn't you have suggested that a month ago? I have to go to a friend's wedding in New Jersey on the 20th, because I couldn't think of any reason I couldn't go.
Let me just say now that if any of you have weddings out-of-state (ok, maybe northern Virginia), don't invite me. Or make it clear in the invitation that you don't really expect me to be there. Not that that will be a problem for the forseeable future, but statistically, at least one (more) of you will probably get married in my lifetime.
Let me just say now that if any of you have weddings out-of-state (ok, maybe northern Virginia), don't invite me. Or make it clear in the invitation that you don't really expect me to be there. Not that that will be a problem for the forseeable future, but statistically, at least one (more) of you will probably get married in my lifetime.
Are you going to get married in 2 or 3 more years? Because I don't think any of the rest of us have a chance.quantus wrote:If you live 2 or 3 more years, then that statement will be true...George wrote:Not that that will be a problem for the forseeable future, but statistically, at least one (more) of you will probably get married in my lifetime.
Hmm, I think there may be business opportunity here. Consider the success of downloadable music and video. By passing on a tiny fraction of your savings on distribution and materials they can undercut the competition, while still maitaining disgusting profit margins.
So, on that model, I propose the sale of downloadable wives to compete directly against the traditional mail-order companies. Sure, digital wives may be suffer some loss of fidelity due to high-compression encoding, and some of the things consumers have historically done with their wives may be prohibited by our DRM technology and the limits of your computer's hardware (I hope), but I don't think most consumers will even notice the difference. And as a bonus we'll allow you to copy your wife to licensed electronic devices so she can go everywhere you do. We suggest you consult a lawyer about local statutes before you take advantage of our "buy one, get one half-off" sale.
So, on that model, I propose the sale of downloadable wives to compete directly against the traditional mail-order companies. Sure, digital wives may be suffer some loss of fidelity due to high-compression encoding, and some of the things consumers have historically done with their wives may be prohibited by our DRM technology and the limits of your computer's hardware (I hope), but I don't think most consumers will even notice the difference. And as a bonus we'll allow you to copy your wife to licensed electronic devices so she can go everywhere you do. We suggest you consult a lawyer about local statutes before you take advantage of our "buy one, get one half-off" sale.
-
- Tenth Dan Procrastinator
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 3:09 am
- Location: San Jose, CA
Since you're married and have a PS2, do you agree or disagree with that statement. I know your time with the PS2 has been rockier than most due to living with black and white games, but you can still provide perspective.Dwindlehop wrote:http://www.slate.com/id/2141633/
A Playstation provides just as much ROI as a wife.