DLP TV's

For general rambling.
Post Reply
quantus
Tenth Dan Procrastinator
Posts: 4891
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 3:09 am
Location: San Jose, CA

DLP TV's

Post by quantus »

What do you guys think of DLP TV's? I think they look better (brighter and sharper) than plasma tv's and they're starting to be cheaper! Here's a fry's ad that has a 55" DLP tv for $2700 after discount.


check out this 55" tv!!!


This seems pretty awesome to me. Is there any reason I wouldn't want to buy something like this? I don't really need a big tv, but it would be nice in my new apartment since I'll actually have room to put it...
Have you clicked today? Check status, then: People, Jobs or Roads

VLSmooth
Tenth Dan Procrastinator
Posts: 3055
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 3:02 am
Location: Varies
Contact:

Post by VLSmooth »

I'm a big supporter of DLPs myself; second only to a direct-view tube, and much more cost-efficient for larger sizes.

As for reasons not to get it, it depends on how much you'll be using the TV. I can tell you my 32" HDTV hasn't really gotten that much use in the past 1.5 years.

Jonathan
Grand Pooh-Bah
Posts: 6722
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 8:45 pm
Location: Portland, OR
Contact:

Post by Jonathan »

We bought a ~30 in. regular television for something like $500, as an added factoid.

Actually, if you want to scientific about it, you should figure out what your viewing distance is, then determine what size television fits into your optimum visual angle.

http://broadcastengineering.com/hdtv-displays/

George
Veteran Doodler
Posts: 1267
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 12:26 am
Location: Arlington, VA

Post by George »

I got all the way through writing this reply and then realized that what I really should do is point you to http://www.avforums.com. The people on that site take their entertainment very seriously. In all likelihood they'll have opinions on the quality and value of the model you posted as well as other competitors in that price range. Now on to the original part of my post...

I continue to be an advocate of digital projectors in many cases. They can usually produce a larger image at a much lower price. Their inputs are comparable and often superior to a TV (my current one actually has the DVI type that supports content protection in addition to VGA, RCA and S-Video).

That said, projectors have weaknesses, too. Mine has color artifacts (rainbows), and many of the other cheap high-res models do also. Also, low contrast video (many live-action movies and TV shows) tends to get washed out if there's much ambient light.

There are a number of low-end "home theater" projectors out now that are supposed to resolve one or both of those problems. You sacrifice high res and 4x3 aspect ratio (both of which I wanted for PC gaming purposes), but get better color quality and contrast ratios (for mid-high light conditions). The Infocus 4805 is one of the most popular (and highly regarded), and it was just selling for $999 with screen at Costco a couple weeks ago. I've also heard good things about the Optoma H30. And that's just in my price range ($1500). If you're willing to go up around the $2500 range, you can get out of the "low-end" and look at some really nice models. The people on AVForum tend to have recommendations for various intended uses and price points. You can probably find better suggestions than I could give you there, as well as pros and cons of projector vs DLP TV vs tube TV vs etc.

bob
Poser
Posts: 344
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 1:26 am
Location: p-town, pa
Contact:

Post by bob »

For $2700, you could get a regular tv, and a college girl who "needs help with her tuition" a few times a week. Then you can have any viewing angle you want.

Peijen
Minion to the Exalted Pooh-Bah
Posts: 2790
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 2:28 pm
Location: Irvine, CA

Post by Peijen »

bob wrote:For $2700, you could get a regular tv, and a college girl who "needs help with her tuition" a few times a week. Then you can have any viewing angle you want.
Joe is in CA. They either have fully paid tuition or Joe couldn't affort to help them.

George
Veteran Doodler
Posts: 1267
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 12:26 am
Location: Arlington, VA

Post by George »

I worked with a guy who dropped out of college to pay for his fiancee's tuition. When she graduated, she called off the marriage and broke up with him. He was still stuck doing dead-end, low paying IT jobs several years later when I met him.

Ideally you want to reverse the situation. One of the only attractive girls I worked with at NG was supporting her fiancee (husband by now) who stopped working so he could go to grad school full time. I never met the guy, but --god damn-- he got a hot chick and doesn't have to go to work. If only the universe were so kind to all of us.

Dave
Tenth Dan Procrastinator
Posts: 3483
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 3:40 pm

Post by Dave »

I wish I was a baller
It takes 43 muscles to frown and 17 to smile, but it doesn't take any to just sit there with a dumb look on your face.

Peijen
Minion to the Exalted Pooh-Bah
Posts: 2790
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 2:28 pm
Location: Irvine, CA

Post by Peijen »

George wrote:Ideally you want to reverse the situation. One of the only attractive girls I worked with at NG was supporting her fiancee (husband by now) who stopped working so he could go to grad school full time. I never met the guy, but --god damn-- he got a hot chick and doesn't have to go to work. If only the universe were so kind to all of us.
At least she is not ugly, otherwise he would've dump her when he is making big buck for some younger, hotter chick.

Post Reply