holy shit
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 6:09 pm
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid= ... A&refer=us
That's pretty big news. I wonder if the accusation will stick...
That's pretty big news. I wonder if the accusation will stick...
If you're still going ham and getting it, don't let up.
https://jonathan.pearce.name/mohtalim/
https://jonathan.pearce.name/mohtalim/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1354
The paper notes that if Libby's story is true, Bush isn't in any legal trouble -- it appears to be within his authority as president to allow classified information to be released to the public -- but it would indicate a major inconsistency with Bush's previous statements on the leak that led to the outing of undercover CIA officer Valerie Plame's identity. Bush has disclaimed any knowledge of the leak and called for anyone who was involved to be punished; if he and Cheney, as Libby says, actually authorized the leak, well, that would be a story.
How is leaking the name of Wilson's wife, covert CIA spy Valerie Plame, not compromising our national security? Or is he trying to say that leaking parts of the National Intelligence Estimate was not related to the Valerie Plame name drop? I'd like to actually understand what really happened, but I guess I'll just stick with the "Republicans are liars" message and continue to not care."Declassifying information and providing it to the public when it is in the public interest is one thing," McClellan said.
"But leaking classified information that could compromise our national security is something that is very serious, and there's a distinction," he said.