Page 1 of 1

attractiveness poll!

Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2004 6:15 am
by Jonathan
Results for this poll probably indicate as much about what people think normal or average size is as their preferences for a woman's size.

Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2004 6:49 am
by Jason
my vote is greatly biased by who I am strongly attracted to at the moment.

When I was trying to go out with an average girl, I liked average girls. When I was trying to go out with a slightly less than average girl, I liked slightly less than average girls.

I doubt this makes very much sense, but you kind of compare your significant other to others in their weight class.

Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2004 2:22 pm
by Peijen
i think you need to post example of each, because what I think is average might be different than what you think is average.

I dont like skin and bone in most cases.

Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2004 3:15 pm
by Dave
As long as they dont weigh more than me!

Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2004 8:16 pm
by VLSmooth
I have to agree with Peijen here. We need examples. Heck I don't even know what's supposed to be average weight for a given height. Time to google I guess.

Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2004 9:48 pm
by Alan
I don't like anorexic girls or behemoths. Generally my tastes tend toward average or slightly under-average. If she's average, I prefer a soccer player's or runner's build. Sleek but muscular legs are a big turn on for me. Thunder-thighs, canckles, and stick-legs just don't do it for me.

But as you all know, I'm way too picky for my own good.

As for examples, someone like Keira Knightley would be at the low end of the weight scale for me. Any skinnier than her is probably too skinny. Someone with a build like Eliza Dushku or Drew Barrymore would be close to my upper limit. Yes, I'm picky.

Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2004 11:31 pm
by Dave
the real question is are you a leg or breast man?

<== legs

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2004 1:19 am
by Alan
I look at the face, then legs, then stomach, then breasts.

For an example of what I look for, I like Kournikova's legs and Knightley's stomach.

This is such an enlightened discussion!

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2004 1:20 am
by Alan
Peijen wrote:i think you need to post example of each, because what I think is average might be different than what you think is average.
Dwindlehop wrote:Results for this poll probably indicate as much about what people think normal or average size is as their preferences for a woman's size.

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2004 1:21 am
by Alan
VLSmooth wrote:I have to agree with Peijen here. We need examples. Heck I don't even know what's supposed to be average weight for a given height. Time to google I guess.
No, don't google, just use your own opinion.

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2004 2:16 am
by VLSmooth
Alan wrote:I look at the face, then legs, then stomach, then breasts.

For an example of what I look for, I like Kournikova's legs and Knightley's stomach.

This is such an enlightened discussion!
Strangely enough, I found Knightley's stomach to be on the too skinny side. A quick googling reveals Eliza Dushku's figure is nice to me. As for priority, I go for face first, then overall body proportions. Everything needs to be proportional to each other to make the whole work IMHO. Yes, it's vague. Deal 8)

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2004 2:17 am
by VLSmooth
As for my opinion, average :)

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2004 2:43 am
by Peijen
alright I voted for average, but what I think of as average is probably above average for some. I guess the none fat drew barrymore (charlie's angle 2) is about right.

so I guess, my preference of average to slightly below average is average+ for alan

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2004 4:42 am
by Alan
Yeah I voted for under-average because I know my average is less than most other people's average.