Page 1 of 1
Labeled vs. Labelled
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2003 9:43 pm
by VLSmooth
Which is the correct spelling?
After googling a bunch I can't tell
M$ Word says labeled
m-w.com says labelled
dictionary.com says both
The seems to provide the most information, but does label use a stressed syllable?
http://writing.englishclub.com/spelling_add-ing.htm
(randomly came up in a design peer review)
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2003 9:56 pm
by Alan
Usually in this situation I think it is "lled".
But "labelled" looks like la-BELL-d instead of LAY-bold.
I'd spell it labeled, but that's just me.
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2003 10:19 pm
by quantus
Sadly, I think MS is right on this one. I always remember being corrected on this to have one l and not two. I think the reason two ll's are being accepted is because so many people make the mistake, so we just change the language to make all those people feel better about themselves. Hey, why not? Languages aren't static. Just like web boards aren't static. Change is good, right? Think of getting GW out of the Whilte House. That would be an awesome change. Or, I'm sure Peijen would agree that getting out of Arkansas would also be an awesome change.
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2003 2:31 pm
by Peijen
Yes. getting our of arkansas would be cool, but not as cool as change english to the way I use it
Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2004 3:03 am
by George
For a while, Arkansas had a law that made it illegal to mispronounce the state name (as Our-Kansas). I don't know if its still in effect or not.
Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2004 5:57 pm
by Jason
Peijen wrote:Yes. getting our of arkansas would be cool, but not as cool as change english to the way I use it
The problem with that would be that then no one would understand each other since your english changes on a daily basis.
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 9:50 pm
by quantus
I have to add to this madness:
label -> labeled
revel -> revelled
Can someone please explain this silliness?!
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 9:53 pm
by quantus
Interesting... Dictionary.com says it's ok for both words to use a single-L or a double-L. Dun dun DUN.
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 9:55 pm
by quantus
And doing more research, m-w.com also says both spellings are ok! This appears to be reversal from the previous research Vinny did on the subject previously.
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 9:59 pm
by Dave
and you had
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 9:59 pm
by Dave
to split that
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 9:59 pm
by Dave
into three posts
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 10:21 pm
by quantus
sure, why not?