best line from a meeting today
-
- Grand Pooh-Bah
- Posts: 6722
- Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 8:45 pm
- Location: Portland, OR
- Contact:
best line from a meeting today
"I don't want to be mean to people with leprosy."
-
- Tenth Dan Procrastinator
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 3:09 am
- Location: San Jose, CA
This just begs for the question: "How the fuck did leprosy come up in a meeting?" Sure, if you were Alan, and trying to go to Med school, then I'd say, sure, ok, it could come up. BUT, you work for Intel! Was there a lepor in the fab shedding skin through his bunny suit on wafers causing yield loss or something?!
editted to add "suit"
editted to add "suit"
Last edited by quantus on Tue Feb 08, 2005 7:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Tenth Dan Procrastinator
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 3:09 am
- Location: San Jose, CA
was it this problem?The 90-nm Mobile Pentium-4 uses 123 watts at full tilt (1.6 GHz), CTO Ditzel said, while Transmeta's Efficeon consumes only 17 watts at the same clock rate.
Take that microprocessors! ASICs forever! well, at least 'til structured ASICs take over...Dally compared power dissipation curves in modern microprocessors with those of ASIC devices. In raw energy, an ASIC might take 2 picojoules to complete a 32-bit operation. A PC or workstation processor takes 2,000 picojoules. The culprit, Dally said, is the interconnects the processor must drive in tasks like generating an address and fetching data from an array. ASICs have scaled gate lines much more aggressively than processors, Dally said, resulting in lower power consumption.
-
- Tenth Dan Procrastinator
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 3:09 am
- Location: San Jose, CA
Hey Dave. Maybe you should work on this. I bet Intel would hire you for a bunch of money if you came up with a cool idea that worked like this...

Sorry for hijacking this topicStanford mechanical engineering professor Ken Goodson described new cooling technologies. "It's a great time to be a heat transfer specialist," he said. As much as $60 million in venture funding went into microfluidic and thermoelectric cooling projects in 2004, he said, as well as a variety of research activities funded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa).
Finned aluminum heat sinks and heat pipes now being utilized with 200-watt processors are often 3,000 times larger than the die itself. "The dream heat sink," Goodson found with Darpa funding is a micro-machined pump that suppresses hot spots on the CPU surface using fluid flows to lower the pressure.

-
- Grand Pooh-Bah
- Posts: 6722
- Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 8:45 pm
- Location: Portland, OR
- Contact:
No.quantus wrote:was it this problem?The 90-nm Mobile Pentium-4 uses 123 watts at full tilt (1.6 GHz), CTO Ditzel said, while Transmeta's Efficeon consumes only 17 watts at the same clock rate.
http://anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdo ... i=2342&p=3
I work for Intel, but I do not speak for Intel. My opinions are not necessarily the opinions of Intel Corporation.Intel Pentium 4 520 (2.8GHz) 84W
-
- Grand Pooh-Bah
- Posts: 6722
- Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 8:45 pm
- Location: Portland, OR
- Contact:
All energy used in computation is converted to heat. We're not creating mass here, or driving chemical changes.
The article is just wrong.
http://www.cpuheat.wz.cz/html/Mobile_Pentium4.txt
1.6 GHz P4 consumes between 32-39W depending on the model you're talking about. Also, there is no 1.6 GHz 90-nm Mobile Pentium-4: Prescott bottoms out at a bus ratio of 14, which at 133 MHz FSB (533 effective) comes out to 1.86 GHz. Also, the idea of the comparison is wrong-headed, because Intel positions the Centrino Pentium M processors as the low power x86 processors. A better comparison is between Efficeon at 1.6 GHz and 17W and Pentium M at 1.6 GHz and 30W (or Dothan at 1.7 GHz and 27W). And even that is somewhat silly; you should be comparing performance per watt.
The article is just wrong.
http://www.cpuheat.wz.cz/html/Mobile_Pentium4.txt
1.6 GHz P4 consumes between 32-39W depending on the model you're talking about. Also, there is no 1.6 GHz 90-nm Mobile Pentium-4: Prescott bottoms out at a bus ratio of 14, which at 133 MHz FSB (533 effective) comes out to 1.86 GHz. Also, the idea of the comparison is wrong-headed, because Intel positions the Centrino Pentium M processors as the low power x86 processors. A better comparison is between Efficeon at 1.6 GHz and 17W and Pentium M at 1.6 GHz and 30W (or Dothan at 1.7 GHz and 27W). And even that is somewhat silly; you should be comparing performance per watt.
-
- Grand Pooh-Bah
- Posts: 6722
- Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 8:45 pm
- Location: Portland, OR
- Contact:
http://www.cpuheat.wz.cz/html/IntelPowerConsumption.htm
A list of links to the various numbers I just spouted.
I am an Intel employee, but I do not speak for Intel. My opinions are my own and not necessarily the opinions of Intel Corporation.
A list of links to the various numbers I just spouted.
I am an Intel employee, but I do not speak for Intel. My opinions are my own and not necessarily the opinions of Intel Corporation.