Wahhh!
Wahhh!
I got my advisor's 21" since he's left and now I find myself WAAYYY too close to th damn screen. (I waqs using a 17" before) I think my desk is too small for it.
It takes 43 muscles to frown and 17 to smile, but it doesn't take any to just sit there with a dumb look on your face.
Re: Wahhh!
Yeah, I'd expect that would be a tight fit.Dave wrote:I got my advisor's 21"
-
- Grand Pooh-Bah
- Posts: 6722
- Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 8:45 pm
- Location: Portland, OR
- Contact:
eh, that's what i had at starcore. at intel, i have a 21". incidently, this is just another one of those reasons why starcore folded.quantus wrote:Clearly, you're sitting a bit too close to your monitor.Dwindlehop wrote:24" is nicer, but then you kinda have to move your head to read all the screen.
-
- Tenth Dan Procrastinator
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 3:09 am
- Location: San Jose, CA
Re: Wahhh!
The MechE Department should do what ECE did to save on desk space; get everyone a 17" or 18" LCD. The only problem with this solution is that you don't get resolutions of 1600x1200 or above. The viewable area though is similar to a 20" monitor though.Dave wrote:I got my advisor's 21" since he's left and now I find myself WAAYYY too close to th damn screen. (I waqs using a 17" before) I think my desk is too small for it.
Re: Wahhh!
Wow, Martin making a perverted comment on one of Dave's posts.Martin wrote:Yeah, I'd expect that would be a tight fit.Dave wrote:I got my advisor's 21"
The end is near.
Re: Wahhh!
That is one of the most beautiful posts I've seen in a long time. So unexpected, yet so pure. Well, as pure as a post like that can be...Martin wrote:Yeah, I'd expect that would be a tight fit.Dave wrote:I got my advisor's 21"