Hijacking for great justice!
Elsewhere on this site I have mentioned my current ride is a
Trek 7200, probably the 2007 model year. I've been riding it since summer '07.
The 7200 has been a good bike for me. When I started, I hadn't biked regularly since getting my learner's permit at age 15. I tested a few other bikes, but I preferred the upright stance and low price of the 7200. The 7200 was comfortable enough that I liked to get on it and ride, but fast enough to grow with me as I improved as a cyclist. I immediately added fenders and a rack to the stock model. Last year I replaced the worn-out 700C/35mm tires for a Continental 32mm touring tire. (Incidentally, this tire is a monster --- eighteen months, zero flats.) Last winter I received a pair of
Giro 100 Proof gloves which meant I was comfortable riding all winter except the few days of the year Portland has ice on the ground.
During the test ride of the 7200, I actually did not like the suspension fork or the twist-style shifter, but the price was right so I took it. Over time, I've grown frustrated with the gearing and the upright stance. I would also like to shift to a clipless pedal to generate power on the upstroke. I never use the rack any more. I would like a quicker bike. In short, I've outgrown the 7200.
I am considering buying the
2010 Trek Portland from my local bike shop, Bike Gallery. It's a discontinued line and not even this year's model, so it's on sale for $1162. At the regular retail price, it's probably a bit more than I want to spend. I really liked the integrated shifters when I test drove it yesterday. I think a disc brake is a wise choice for riding in wet weather conditions, but I did find the stock brakes on the 2010 to be mushier than I would like. It is significantly lighter than the 7200, but on the heavy side for a road bike (well above 20 lbs. without full fenders). The wheels are 24 spoke and I am concerned about the reliability of them. I am not very concerned about the brakes, because I can replace them quite cheaply.
The Portland geometry was a little weird for me on the 63cm frame. I tried a Raleigh Port Townshend touring bike which was more comfortable, but had these real annoying bar-end shifters I just could not stand to use. The salesguy said the stem on the Portland I was looking at was extra-long, so I could replace the stem with a smaller one for $40 and it may feel better then. Full fenders would be another $40. Perhaps, though, I should just look at some actual road bikes that can accept full fenders, instead. I'm heading back to the bike shop soon.
The gear question is tricky. The Portland has a triple chain-ring crank like the 7200. The Portland's crank is 50-39-30 compared to the 7200's 48-38-28, so the Portland is really covering the same range with just slightly higher gearing. The Portland's cassette is a 9 speed 11-26 compared to the 8 speed 11-32. I never use the 32, so the Portland will have effectively two more usable gears on the rear with the separation between gears significantly closer. I rarely use the third chain-ring and have thought I could do without it. On the flat, I can cruise along at 48/11 but lately I have been using 48/12 and increasing my cadence to compensate. Hopefully on the Portland I can cruise along at 50/12 with the same level of exertion as 48/12 on the 7200. If I really decide I want to change the gearing I think it is reasonably priced --- when I wore out a chain and cassette the replacements were about $80.
Since I don't use the rack for commuting, I think I will keep a rack off the new bike but hold onto my 7200 for hauling duty or bike path exploring.
Reviews have been generally kind to the Portland, but forum commenters are less so.
Summary:
- Need integrated shifters
- Need full fenders
- Need drop handlebars
- Want clipless pedal
- Want a quicker ride from stop
- Want a more aggressive geometry (maybe)
- Want disc brakes (maybe)
- Really unsure about the 24 spoke wheels