Page 4 of 10

Re: daily awesome

Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 11:58 pm
by Jonathan
http://mobile.avclub.com/articles/shia- ... von,83587/

The comment thread here redefines the neologism "mediocore" to mean porn that is between soft- and hardcore. This must immediately be pressed into common usage. Forced, even.

I imagine it must be like an airplane edit of a Sasha Grey adult film.

Re: daily awesome

Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 5:16 pm
by Jonathan
Biden/Biden 2016
One's a wonk who rides Amtrak. The other drives a sweet Firebird and has banged every chick in Washington.

Re: daily awesome

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 4:03 am
by Jonathan
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said he would "go nuts" if he hears complaints it was because Romney wasn't conservative enough.

"We're not losing 95 percent of African-Americans and two-thirds of Hispanics and voters under 30 because we're not being hard-ass enough," he said.

Re: daily awesome

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 1:17 am
by Jonathan
Most of the polls I “unskewed” were based on samples that generally included about five or six or seven percent more Democrats than Republicans, and I doubted and questioned the results of those polls, and then “unskewed” them based on my belief that a nearly equal percentage of Democrats and Republicans would turn out in the actual election this year. I was wrong on that assumption and those who predicted a turnout model of five or six percent in favor of Democrats were right. Likewise, the polling numbers they produced going on that assumption turned out to be right and my “unskewed” numbers were off the mark.
Quotation marks in the original from the guy behind unskewedpolls.com.

Re: daily awesome

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 6:19 pm
by Alan
So he intentionally skewed his poll results and called them "unskewed."

Nice.

Re: daily awesome

Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 9:24 pm
by Jonathan
let i : t₀ → present, then

Sᵢ ≡ G ↔ G = DDD ∖ P
where S is the set of sexy people for time i
and is defined as the set of Geeks if and only if
Geeks are defined as the relative complement (or difference) of pants wearers removed from the set of large-breasted women.

Re: daily awesome

Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 6:06 pm
by Jonathan
"I went to see what that flash in the sky was about," recalled resident Marat Lobkovsky. "And then the window glass shattered, bouncing back on me. My beard was cut open, but not deep. They patched me up. It's OK now."
Obama needs to take the steps necessary to close the beard-patching gap.

Re: daily awesome

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 6:58 pm
by Jonathan
Reposted Youtube Comments wrote:I have learned to be content with what I have and not what I long for.

Re: daily awesome

Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 8:45 pm
by Jonathan
Google
mjw nbc community
and it returns a bunch of links to Malcom Jamal-Warner stories, even though he is not the most relevant result for MJW. That is kind of awesome.

Re: daily awesome

Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:33 am
by Jonathan
Neil deGrasse Tyson doesn't make science cool; science makes Neil deGrasse Tyson cool.

Read more: http://www.cracked.com/blog/6-mind-blow ... z2NkTU6Pt9
Yup

Re: daily awesome

Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 12:29 am
by quantus
Supermassive black holes can reach the Eddington limit, where continuum radiation force defeats the otherwise irresistible gravitational attraction. (That sentence contains more band names and anime series subtitles than anything else I've ever written.)
in the real heavens, the light can be so intense that it shoves you back.

Re: daily awesome

Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 10:26 pm
by Jonathan
I am sexually attracted to Michael Fassbender. No homo.

Men like it more than anything else when you stick ANOTHER BUTT in their butt.

Re: daily awesome

Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2014 12:34 am
by Jonathan
“You mean I can get all of the blazing-fast speeds of Comcast coupled with the dependability of Time Warner Cable?”
gogo The Onion

Re: daily awesome

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 12:16 am
by Jonathan
Meeting agenda
<<my friend>> will go over our current <<project>> latency. – ½ hour
An Intel fellow
I knew the latency was long, but ½ hour is probably a showstopper…

Re: daily awesome

Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2014 9:27 pm
by Jonathan
Aziz Ansari wrote:This is a good story I heard about Tinder in one of our focus groups with a guy who lived in a small town. He turned on Tinder. It showed the first girl. He swiped no. The second girl came up. He swiped no again. Then it said, that’s all the girls in his area. He freaked out and thought, “Oh shit! Can I go back?!” So many parts of that story sum up modern romance to me.

Re: daily awesome

Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:53 pm
by Jonathan
Man, if Hayden Christensen defeats Samuel L. Jackson in a fight in your movie, then you are filmmaking wrong.
We also would have accepted "anyone named Hayden".

Re: daily awesome

Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 5:36 pm
by Peijen
this is a pointer

Re: daily awesome

Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2014 5:23 am
by quantus
Jonathan wrote:
Neil deGrasse Tyson doesn't make science cool; science makes Neil deGrasse Tyson cool.

Read more: http://www.cracked.com/blog/6-mind-blow ... z2NkTU6Pt9
Yup
heh, the rar's for cosmos were titled: ndt.knows.his.shit.<removed>.rar

Re: daily awesome

Posted: Thu May 22, 2014 11:18 pm
by Jonathan
G: I went to a strip club with my male in-laws and was told to expect lots of attention because I was wearing a belt. Evidently wearing a belt means you're loaded.
A: Did the strippers take your belt off and whip you with it? That's a go to stripper move, if I've ever seen one.
G: Much like 1st grade class pictures when I wore my favorite sweater and mom said I'd get lots of female attention, I did not get any female attention.

Re: daily awesome

Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:25 pm
by Jonathan
can’t-miss pairings like Arya-Hound, Tyrion-Jaime, and Salladhor-Jacuzzi
Salladhor <3 Jacuzzi 4ever!